Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ZANG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13702
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EDWARD ZANG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zang v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00678
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James Zang
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foster v. Zhang
as 2:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Charles Foster
Defendant:
Deng Zang and Deng Zhang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Stewart v. VA Medical Center, et al
as 4:2022cv04683
Plaintiff:
William-Bullock Stewart
Defendant:
VA Medical Center, Eric L. Dwight-Gilroy, Dale L. Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Antonelli et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11775
Plaintiff:
Kevin Comer, Wayne Wichern, Falamarz Youseflaleh and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Abeyta v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00928
Defendant:
Katherine Zang and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Eliza Abeyta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ZANG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30233
Plaintiff:
PAUL R. ZANG
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Dillon et al v. Zang et al
as 3:2008cv00282
Plaintiff:
Paul Dillon and Tammy Dillon
Defendant:
Jerry Zang, Illinois-Indiana EM-I Medical Services, S.C., Union County Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ware et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2006cv08376
Plaintiff:
Constance Ware, Betty Hernandez, Margaret Victorian and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
