Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Dean, Sr. et al v. AII Acquisition LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01467
Defendant: AII Acquisition LLC, Flowserve Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA and others
Plaintiff: Nile Dean, Sr. and Camellia Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hatfield v. HGC, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00756
Defendant: HGC, Inc. and/or successor in interest to any or all of the following: doing business as Hatfield Gun Company also known as Hatfield Gun Company Ltd. also known as Hatfield Gun Company LLC, Hatfield Gun Company Ltd. and Hatfield Gun Company LLC
Plaintiff: Ann D. Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
McGarvey v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2023cv00748
Plaintiff: Brenda McGarvey
Defendant: 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Williams v. PTI Union, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01137
Defendant: Black Creek Corporation, PTI Union, LLC sued individually and as successor-in-interest to PHARMA TECH INDUSTRIES, INC. f/k/a BLACK CREEK CORPORATION, as successor-in-interest to DIRECT PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION and as successor-in interest to ENVI DIVERSIFIED, INC f/k/a PHA and Pharma Tech Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff: Candace C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Mayo Clinic v. United States
as 23-2246
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mayo Clinic, a Minnesota Corporation, on its own behalf and as successor in interest to Mayo Foundation
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America
Sahm et al v. Allegheny Technologies Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff: Janet Sahm, Peter Sahm and David Sahm
Defendant: ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INC., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest To TELEDYNE MOVIBLE OFFSHORE, INC.,, AVCO CORPORATION, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to LYCOMING ENGINES, BAKER HUGHES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joseph Favors v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-1018
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant / Appellee: Jodi Harpstead, Individual/Official Capacities and as Commissioner of DHS/MSOP; And their successors in interest, Nancy Johnston, Individual/Official Capacities and as Executive Director of MSOP; And their successors in interest, Bryan Lake, Individual/Official Capacities and as SRB Chair Person; And their successors in interest and others
Joseph Favors v. Samantha Ensz, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2826
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant / Appellee: Samantha Ensz, Individual/official capacities and Therapist of CPS, Michael Hettig, Individual/official capacities and as Clinical Supervisor of CPS, Nancy Johnston, Individual/official capacities and as Executive Director of MSOP/CPS and others
InteRebar Fabricators LLC v. Lunda/C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture et al
as 0:2021cv01685
Plaintiff: InteRebar Fabricators LLC and JRC Opco LLC, successor-in-interest to Metal Partners Rebar, LLC
Defendant: Lunda/C.S. McCrossan Joint Venture, Lunda Construction Company and C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Blattner Energy, Inc. v. Union Electric Company et al
as 4:2021mc00558
Respondent: Lone Star Transportation, LLC and Union Electric Company successor in interest to TG High Prarie, LLC doing business as Ameren Missouri
Claimant: Blattner Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?