Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hatfield v. HGC, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00756
Defendant:
HGC, Inc. and/or successor in interest to any or all of the following: doing business as Hatfield Gun Company also known as Hatfield Gun Company Ltd. also known as Hatfield Gun Company LLC, Hatfield Gun Company Ltd. and Hatfield Gun Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Ann D. Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Cirba Inc. v. VMware, Inc.
as 23-1770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CIRBA INC., dba Densify, as the successor-in-interest to Cirba IP, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
VMWARE, INC.
Willia Dean Parker, et al v. Sarah Hinton
as 22-5348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLA DEAN PARKER, ROSE BANKS, individually and as successor-in-interest to Homer Banks and WILLIA DEAN PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH HINTON, in her capacity as executor of the Estate of Spencer Davis
Pinder v. West Coast Sports Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lucy Pinder
Defendant:
Peoria Ave LLC, West Coast Sports Incorporated, Peoria Ave LLC an Arizona limited liability corporation successor in interest West Coast Sports Incorporated doing business as Centerfolds Cabaret and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
One Media IP Limited v. S.A.A.R. SrL, et al
as 17-5293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ONE MEDIA IP LIMITED, As successor-in-interest to TELOS HOLDINGS, INC., dba Point Classics
Defendant:
S.A.A.R. SRL, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY HADAWAY ORGANISATION, LTD., HHO LICENSING LIMITED and HENRY HADAWAY
David Coyle v. University of Kentucky, et al
as 14-5401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID COYLE, individually and doing business as Team Coyle Photography
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS COMMITTEE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, as successor in interest to the University of Kentucky Athletics Association, ERIC N. MONDAY, individually and in his capacity as Executive Vice President for Finance and Administration of the University of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
PAUL MILLER FORD, INC., UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, HANDS ON ORIGINALS, INC. and others
Fourth Age Limited, et al v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc, et al
as 13-56392
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
FOURTH AGE LIMITED, a United Kingdom corporation, PRISCILLA MARY ANNE REUEL TOLKIEN, as Trustee of the Tolkien Trust, a United Kingdom Charitable Trust, J.R.R. TOLING ESTATE LIMITED, a United Kingdom corporation and others
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
NEW LINE PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation as successor-in-interest to New Line Cinema Corp., WARNER BROS DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION, INC., a division of Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc, a Delaware corporation and others
Steele v. Ricigliano, et al
as 11-1675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL BARTLEY STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY RICIGLIANO, BOSTON RED SOX BASEBALL CLUB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BRETT LANGEFELS and others
Vincent Cusano v. Stanley Eisen, et al
as 10-56189
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
VINCENT CUSANO, FKA Vinnie Vincent, DBA Streetbeat Music, DBA Vinnie Vincent Music
Counter-claimant:
KISS CATALOG LTD., Successor-in-interest to the Kiss Company, a Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY EISEN, an individual, THE KISS COMPANY, a New York corporation, GENE SIMMONS WORLDWIDE INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
GENE KLEIN, an individual and PAUL STANLEY
Third-party-defendant:
METALUMA RECORDS LLC
Warren Freedenfeld Associates, v. McTigue, et al
as 09-2164
Plaintiff - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
WARREN FREEDENFELD ASSOCIATES, INC., as successor in interest to Warren Freedenfeld & Associates, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
GARDNER ANIMAL CARE CENTER, LLC, d/b/a Gardner Animal Hospital and MICHAEL MCTIGUE
Defendant:
ASSOCIATES, INC., BENNETT BUILDING CORPORATION, EDWARD D. CORMIER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
