Civil Rights Cases filed in Alaska
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Briggs v. Yi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00265
Plaintiff: Joshua D. Briggs
Defendant: Orean Yi and Municipality of Anchorage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holger et al v. Gleason et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff: Louis Holger and The Alaska Native Children & Families
Defendant: Sharon L. Gleason, Jonas M. Walker, Bryan Schroder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nordlund v. Eubank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00085
Defendant: Sondra Thomas, Dominick Eubank, Aaron Richwine and others
Plaintiff: David C. Nordlund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00009
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00010
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 3:2019cv00141
Defendant: Reese McKinney, County of Montgomery and D. T. Marshall
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 3:2019cv00104
Defendant: Patrick D. Smith and City of Birmingham
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pomeroy v. State of Alaska
as 3:2018cv00061
Petitioner: Richard D. Pomeroy
Respondent: State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lynch v. DeLaubenfels et al
as 4:2017cv00025
Plaintiff: Sean K. Lynch
Defendant: Richard J. DeLaubenfels, Robert M. DeLaubenfels, Mike Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?