Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: $5,730 in United States currency et al
as 4:2024mc00008
Not Yet Classified:
$5,730 in United States Currency and Chevrolet Equinox 2013, VIN: 2GNFLGEKXD6167748
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-925
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-907
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BURKE et al v. BACHERT et al
as 5:2023cv01959
Plaintiff:
SEAN P BURKE, EQUINOX ADVANTAGE REAL ESTATE I, INC., STELLA CADENTE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF EDWARD BACHERT, OFFICER RICHARD PENN, CHARLES F ZURICK, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-608
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Lau et al v. Wokumi et al
as 1:2023cv02438
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lau, Joseph Barton and Jose Mercado
Defendant:
Wokumi, Tokyo Ichiban Foods, Wagamama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Healthcare Ally Management of California LLC v. Equinox Holding, Inc.
as 2:2022cv08692
Plaintiff:
Healthcare Ally Management of California LLC
Defendant:
Equinox Holding, Inc., DOES 1-10, Equinox Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
