Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AGOSTO v. JOSEPH JACOB JEWELERS LLC et al
as 1:2023cv20661
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN AGOSTO
Defendant:
JOSEPH JACOB JEWELERS LLC and JOSEPH FTEHA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Costar Imports, Inc. v. Joseph Jacob Jewelers
as 2:2023cv05190
Plaintiff:
Costar Imports, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Jacob Jewelers LLC, Joseph Jacob Jewelers and Joseph J Fteha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jacoby v. Neuropace, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08136
Plaintiff:
James Jacoby, George Vachtsevanos and Javier Echauz
Defendant:
Neuropace, Inc., Michael Favet, Frank Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Jacob v. Saul
as 4:2020cv04314
Plaintiff:
Philip Joseph Jacob
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RAAB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26211
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JACOB RAAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANLANDUYT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87202
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JACOB VANLANDUYT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garisto v. Topper et al
as 1:2020cv00646
Defendant:
Joseph Jacob, Richard Schur and Curt Topper
Plaintiff:
Stephen Garisto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
