Cases 1 - 10 of 726
PAYNE v. TRULIANT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PAYNE
Defendant:
TRULIANT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and DOXIM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
BRITT v. GREGG et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DESEIRAY BRITT
Defendant:
KATHRYN LEBAUBE GREGG, CHRISTOPHER BAILEY, GREGORY BOONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coombs v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Coombs
Defendant:
United States of America
Dixon v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dixon
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Orr v. Cothron et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Orr
Defendant:
David Cothron, Derek Price, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eco Fiber Inc. v. Yukon Packaging, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Eco Fiber Inc.
Defendant:
Yukon Packaging, LLC, Zone 1 Consulting, Christopher James Poore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS v. HIRSCH et al
as 5:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans
Respondent:
Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon, Stacy Eggers IV and others
Intervenor:
Philip E. Berger and Timothy K. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARVEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
KEVIN TERRELL HARVEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Murdock v. Ingram et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, FNU Williams and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
