Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Keeton v. Dudley et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Brooke Keeton
Defendant:
James Roane Dudley, Angela Epps, Brendan Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Contreras v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Herber Otoniel Luna Contreras
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Luna Innovations Incorporated v. Quad Plus, LLC
as 7:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Luna Innovations Incorporated
Defendant:
Quad Plus, LLC
Luna Gomez v. Frey
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Marvin Eduardo Luna Gomez
Defendant:
John T. Frey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luna v. Streeval
as 7:2021cv00415
Petitioner:
Pascual Luna
Respondent:
Warden Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Luna Innovations Incorporated v. Kiss Technologies, Incorporated
as 7:2021cv00188
Defendant:
Kiss Technologies, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Luna Innovations Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farias et al v. Strickland Waterproofing Company, Incorporated
as 3:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
David De Jesus, Antonio Luna, Osmely Perozo-Ferreira and others
Defendant:
Strickland Waterproofing Company, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gomez v. Virginia Department of Correction Keen Mountain Correctional Center
as 7:2020cv00726
Plaintiff:
Marvin Eduardo Luna Gomez
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Correction Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Virginia Department of Correction Keen Mountain Correctional Center
as 3:2020cv00886
Plaintiff:
Marvin Eduardo Luna Gomez
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Correction Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
