Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sims v. Keshena et al
as 2:2015cv01249
Plaintiff:
Kendale Sims
Defendant:
Dr Keshena, Barker, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMS Financial XXVII, LLC v. Davis
as 1:2015cv08166
Plaintiff:
SMS Financial XXVII, LLC
Defendant:
Allison S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00099
Defendant:
ACE GREASE SERVICE, INC., DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC., GMRI, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TWILA D. PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hoskins v. Prentice et al
as 1:2015cv01248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
S Prentice, Randy Pfister, B Schmeltz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Attig et al
as 1:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Defendant:
Jim B Attig, Patricia L West, Aberardo A Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TB et al v. TGI Friday's Inc
as 2:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
TB , MB , MM and others
Defendant:
TGI Friday's Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sharon Laskin, et al v. Veronica Siegel, et al
as 12-3041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON LASKIN and SUSAN ISAACSON, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
VERONICA SIEGEL, individually, as trustee of the Phillip Siegel Revocable Trust Dated August 28, 1998, Estate of PHILLIP P. SIEGEL, SMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., formerly known as JEFCO LABORATORIES, INC., JEFCO LABORATORIES INC. PROFIT-SHARING PLAN AND TRUST and others
SM et al v. Griffith Public Schools
as 2:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
SM , JD and KF
Defendant:
Griffith Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
