Cases 11 - 20 of 2,689
Shields v. Obion County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01082
Petitioner:
Carale Shields
Respondent:
Obion County, Tennessee and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Nathaniel S Robinson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Duncan v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
James D Duncan
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jeremy Sims
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enix v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Tyler Ward Enix
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
OH Bureau of Workers' Comp., et al v. SEC
as 24-1631
Petitioner:
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Commonwealth of Kentucky, ex rel. Attorney General Russell Coleman and State of Tennessee, ex rel. Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti
Respondent:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
UNITED STATES et al v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, et al v. SEC
as 24-3220
Petitioner:
OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ex rel., RUSSELL MATTHEW COLEMAN, Attorney General and others
Respondent:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
