Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Zitterkopf v. Zitterkopf et al
as 4:2024cv03144
Defendant:
Darla Simpson, Jennifer Zitterkopf and Allan Turner
Plaintiff:
William D. Zitterkopf, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simpson v. USA
as 8:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Ramon Simpson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Simpson v. Gable, et al
as 8:2023cv00260
Petitioner:
Arthur C. Simpson
Respondent:
Nebraska, Craig Gable and Bob Jeffrys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lightfeather v. Osborn et al
as 4:2020cv03118
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Brenda Mae Stinson, Rusty Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2020cv00318
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Marvin Simpson
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv03168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00470
Defendant:
Fred Britten, Bruns, Busboom and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua G. Franklin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00155
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Hargreaves, John Does-1-15 and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bertucci v. Simpson et al
as 8:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Lamar Bertucci
Defendant:
Sandra Denton, Edith Simpson and Mark Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
