Cases 1 - 10 of 22,888
United States v. Ananayo
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Betty Ananayo
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
United States of America v. Clark
as 4:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mario D Clark
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01524
Defendant:
United States of America and Mario D Clark
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Hansen v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv08080
Plaintiff:
Gerald Monte Hansen, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of State and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Meenakshisundaram et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 5:2024cv02441
Plaintiff:
Ramesh Meenakshisundaram and Meenakshi Muthuraman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Valero Marketing and Supply Company v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Valero Marketing and Supply Company
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax
John Karl, Jr. v. Daniel Werfel
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KARL, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JONATHAN R. BRONLEY, in his Capacity as Administrator, C.T.A., d.b.n. for the Estate of Linda J. Solomon, deceased
Ho v. Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
as 3:2024cv02404
Plaintiff:
Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ho v. Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
as 3:2024cv02410
Plaintiff:
Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
