Cases 11 - 20 of 112,052
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BREWSTER v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JEAN BREWSTER
Defendant:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. and CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
JACKSON, NALL, K. PADGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CASEY JACOBS-CAMPBELL and MIKAYLA WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAGE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LOUIS SAGE
Defendant:
CRAWFORD, STROSNIDER, VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CELLA v. LILLY USA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CELLA
Defendant:
LILLY USA LLC and THE LILLY SEVERANCE PAYMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Philip J Yoder
Defendant:
Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Division Of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLANCHARD v. HEGG et al
as 3:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Lavara Blanchard
Defendant:
Ron Hegg and A Hahn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Deanna Fox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
