Cases 11 - 20 of 23
City of Roseville et al v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv00085
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System, Local 282 Pension Trust Fund and Saginaw Police and Fire Retirement System, Saginaw Police and Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Micron Technology, Inc., Steven R Appleton, Wilbur G. Stover, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
City of Roseville Employees Retirement System v. Imperial Holdings, Inc. et al
as 9:2011cv81300
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Imperial Holdings, Inc. , Antony Mitchell , Richard O'Connell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boston Scientific Corporation
as 11-2250
Plaintiff:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and IRON WORKERS LOCALS 40, 361, 417 UNION SECURITY FUNDS
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEELWORKERS PENSION TRUST and KBC ASSET MANAGEMENT NV
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, J. RAYMOND ELLIOTT, JAMES R. TOBIN and others
Automotive Industries Pension v. Textron Inc., et al
as 11-2106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION TRUST FUND AND THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
Plaintiff:
OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXTRON INC., LEWIS B. CAMPBELL, TED R. FRENCH and others
Interested Party:
CLEVELAND BAKERS & TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, CLEVELAND BAKERS & TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00610
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation , Michael W. Laphen and Michael J. Mancuso
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
City of Roseville Employees' R, et al v. Orloff Fam Tr, et al
as 11-35455
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, LOCAL 282 PENSION TRUST FUND AND SAGINAW POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, SAGINAW POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Objector - Appellant:
ORLOFF FAM TR UAD 12/31/01 MARSHALL J. ORLOFF & ANN S. ORLOFF TTEES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., STEVEN R. APPLETON, WILBUR G. STOVER, Jr. and others
CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. CRAIN et al
as 2:2011cv02919
Plaintiff:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
BRUCE G. CRAIN , MARC S. GOLDFARB , GUY A. PAGLINCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenters Health &, et al v. Coca-Cola Co, et al
as 1:2000cv02838
Plaintiff:
Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund, Carpenters Health & Welfare Fund of Philidelphia & Vicinity and Gaetan Lavalla
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust Fund and City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Not Classified By Court:
Brian E. McDonough, Charles B. Reiner, Constance E. Haddad and others
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company, James E. Chestnut, Douglas Daft and others
Petitioner:
Tamara Minick-Scokalo, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and FBI
Special Master:
Hunter R. Hughes, III and John T. Marshall
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv10593
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, J. Raymond Elliott, James R. Tobin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System et al v. Nokia Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00967
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Nokia Corporation, Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, Richard A. Simonson and others
Movant:
Wai Kit Siu , Narasimhan S. Ramadoss , Mehran Parsheh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
