Cases 1 - 10 of 16,115
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searles et al v. CITY OF HOUSTON et al
as 4:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Mia Searles, Tiffany Rachal, Warren Randle and others
Defendant:
CITY OF HOUSTON, Troy Finner, Shane C Privette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024bk13938
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Houston Prime v. Community Loan
as 24-20171
Plaintiff:
Houston Prime Investments, Limited
Defendant:
Community Loan Servicing, L.L.C.
Vaughan et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughan, Dominic Pagliuso, Ralph Hensley II and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Watford et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watford, Kenneth Vaughan, Greg Vanhooser and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
