Cases 41 - 50 of 825,141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05713
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Richards v. Exxon Mobile et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barragan et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
as 3:2024cv02551
Plaintiff:
Suleyma Barragan and Julio Ortiz
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tingle v. Defilippis
as 4:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kristopher Tingle
Defendant:
Steve Defilippis and Law Office of Picone and Defilippis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catalyst Inc. v. Empathy Catalyst Consulting
as 3:2024cv02557
Plaintiff:
Catalyst Inc.
Defendant:
Empathy Catalyst Consulting
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
McKnight v. Snopes Media Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Daniel William McKnight
Defendant:
Snopes Media Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Hardy v. Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Company, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hardy
Defendant:
Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
INTERNET RESEARCH BUREAU L.L.C. v. OPTIMAL STRATEGIX GROUP, INC.
as 2:2024cv01790
Plaintiff:
INTERNET RESEARCH BUREAU L.L.C.
Defendant:
OPTIMAL STRATEGIX GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KELLEY v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01793
Plaintiff:
ROBYN KELLEY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS, INC., NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
