Cases 61 - 70 of 825,547
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
B9 MF 1286 W Capitol LLC v. Dewonda Flowers et al
as 2:2024cv03554
Plaintiff:
B9 MF 1286 W Capitol LLC
Defendant:
Dewonda Flowers, Corrinn Flowers and Ray Johnson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Matthew E Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03632
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Mazgaj et al v. Charles
as 3:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Mildred Mazgaj and Marian Anthony
Defendant:
Jason Charles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Network System Technologies, LLC v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Network System Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
WOODBURY SPINE ASSOCIATES v. HIGHMARK INC.
as 1:2024cv05813
Plaintiff:
WOODBURY SPINE ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
HIGHMARK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mott v. Walmart Supercenter#221 et al
as 5:2024cv00443
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter#221, Walmart Inc, Walmart Stores East Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Mott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
