Cases 1 - 10 of 100
G+ Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 26-1902
Plaintiff:
G+ COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Collision Communications, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 26-1893
Plaintiff:
COLLISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Harbor Island Dynamic LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 26-1886
Appellant:
HARBOR ISLAND DYNAMIC LLC
Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and NXP SEMICONDUCTORS N.V.
BenedorTSE, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2026cv00728
Plaintiff:
BenedorTSE, LLC
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Power2B, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 26-1833
Appellant:
POWER2B, INC.
Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Power2B, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 26-1834
Appellant:
POWER2B, INC.
Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Nassif et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. et al
as 1:2026cv05567
Plaintiff:
Victoria Nassif, Carol Marin, Philip Rogers and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-50387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Empire Technology Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 26-1822
Appellant:
EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC
Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
as 26-1815
Appellant:
PICTIVA DISPLAYS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
Appellee:
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
