Stockholders Suits Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 223
JONES v. DUFRENE et al
as 2:2020cv00760
Defendant: TANNER DUFRENE and TJD ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff: BRANDON JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUBIN v. MCGARRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00313
Defendant: MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, JAMES G. BERGES and others
Plaintiff: BRENDA RUBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A HASHIM et al v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv01213
Plaintiff: JEHAN HASHIM A HASHIM, AHMED HASHIM A HASHIM, SARA HASHIM A HASHIM and others
Defendant: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owen v. Birchard et al
as 3:2020cv00200
Plaintiff: David Owen
Defendant: DJO Holding Corp, L&D Stoneworks, Inc., Lance Birchard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00075
Defendant: MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, JAMES G. BERGES and others
Plaintiff: L. COURTLAND LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDSAY et al v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00253
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER H. LINDSAY, JR. and CHARLES R. BLACKBURN
Defendant: MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, ROBERT RIPP and others
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant: Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff: Robert Garfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRODY v. MYLAN N.V. et al
as 2:2019cv01620
Plaintiff: DANIEL BRODY
Defendant: MYLAN N.V., KENNETH S. PARK, RAJIV MALIK and others
MCKERNAN v. GOWEN et al
as 2:2019cv05314
Defendant: LEON O. MOULDER, JR., TREVENA, INC., MAXINE GOWEN and others
Plaintiff: LISA MCKERNAN
FELDMAN v. PA AUTO INSURANCE OUTLET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv04129
Defendant: WARREN KUKISH, ROBERT REFICE, EDWARD GERBER and others
Plaintiff: ALAN MORRIS FELDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?