Cases 101 - 110 of 70,932
Lima Township Residents et al v. Lima Township Board et al
as 2:2024cv10666
Plaintiff:
Lima Township Residents and Citizens of Lima for Cannabis
Defendant:
Lima Township Board, Duane Luick, Nanette Havens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winningham v. Fentress County et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Trisha Winningham
Defendant:
Fentress County, Michael Reagon, Fast Access Healthcare, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rutan v. Cast et al
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Jon Paul Rutan
Defendant:
Marney Cast, Abe Dane, Brent Leininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Burks v. Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency
as 2:2024cv02330
Defendant:
Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency and CSEA
Plaintiff:
Jordan Burks
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
