Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 91 - 100 of 379,811
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05534
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
KEITH v. MCGINLEY et al
as 3:2019cv00200
Respondent: THOMAS MCGINLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: JEFFREY A. KEITH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TEJADA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv05448
Plaintiff: KELVIN TEJADA
Defendant: CORRIZON HEALTH, INC., CORIZON EMPLOYEE JOHN DOE, DR. LEE BERMAN and others
Cross Defendant: CORIZON HEALTH INC
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
CHAM v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 3:2020cv00011
Petitioner: QUANG CHAM
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01992
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
CUADRADO v. FIRST STUDENT INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05483
Defendant: FIRST STUDENT INC., JOHN DOE, RONALD PALMER
Plaintiff: NICOLAS CUADRADO
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal- Product Liability
SILLS et al v. WAWA, INC.
as 2:2020cv00286
Plaintiff: CORINNE M. MULLEN, JOSEPH DIVITA, ANDREA SILLS
Defendant: WAWA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
JOHNSON v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
as 2:2020cv00068
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Petitioner: CHASE COOPER JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCNAIR v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2020cv00278
Petitioner: WILLIAM MCNAIR, KAREEM MCNAIR
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF:, SUPERINTENDENT MARK GARMAN
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WASHINGTON v. TRUMP
as 2:2020cv00062
Defendant: PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff: PRESIDENT GEORGE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?