Cases 91 - 100 of 94,758
(HC) Rile v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv00844
Petitioner:
James Edward Eloy Rile
Respondent:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams #319412 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Timothy Huntley Williams
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv05196
Petitioner:
Anthony C Rowe
Respondent:
Jack Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Palma Roque v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03561
Petitioner:
Kevin Palma Roque
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lotshaw v. LVCCC Halfway House Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
Lonnie W. Lotshaw
Respondent:
LVCCC Halfway House Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05332
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Scroggins v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Scroggins
Defendant:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha
as 2:2024cv02295
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. State of Montana
as 1:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
James Ronald Wilson
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butsch v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Clayton E Butsch
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
