Cases 91 - 100 of 91,540
Perez v Consumer Financial Services Corporation
as 1:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bryant et al v. Wilder et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Bryant and Ann W.E. Bryant
Defendant:
Kimberly Wilder, David Wilder and Attorney Matthew Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hartz v. Real Estate One, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03160
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hartz
Defendant:
Real Estate One, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Randall v. ACE Hardware Corporation
as 1:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Justin Randall
Defendant:
ACE Hardware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Vita et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
McGarity v. Sun-Maid Growers of California et al
as 3:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Margaret McGarity
Defendant:
Sun-Maid Growers of California and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Shamieh et al v. Rosenberg et al
as 3:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Ramez Shamieh and Anissa Shamieh
Defendant:
Barry Rosenberg, Shelly Rosenberg and Double 2X USA, LLC doing business as Designer Roofer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Qatalyst Inc v. Pipes.AI, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Qatalyst Inc
Defendant:
Pipes.AI, LLC, 805Guru,LLC and Drew Thorne-Thomsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bolyard v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03138
Plaintiff:
Monica Bolyard
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lillian Vogt v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 24-1808
Plaintiff:
Lillian Louis Morgan Vogt
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
