Cases 101 - 110 of 788
Harvey v. Battelle Memorial Institute
as 4:2020cv05218
Defendant:
Battelle Memorial Institute
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Harvey
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 4712
Harris et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00187
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Persons and Entities 1-10 and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Harris and Kenneth Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Kram v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 2:2020cv02177
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Amtrak
Plaintiff:
David M. Kram
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Moxley v. Orozco
as 2:2020cv01964
Plaintiff:
Mychelle Moxley
Defendant:
Christina Orozco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Popp v. Montana Rail Link
as 9:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Montana Rail Link
Plaintiff:
Jacob Popp
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2020cv01730
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Bauman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Kesler v. Puget Sound & Pacific Railroad
as 3:2020cv06075
Plaintiff:
Kolbey Kesler
Defendant:
Puget Sound & Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ladue et al v. Kettle Falls International Railway LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01472
Defendant:
Omnitrax, Inc., Kettle Falls Railway, LLC, Omnitrax Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael LaDue and Amanda Ladue
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
John Frederick Gayton et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 8:2020cv01907
Plaintiff:
Attorney Marguerite Sisney Sanvictores and John Frederick Gayton
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Kelvin Dang and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Yasmine Samalya v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2020cv08735
Plaintiff:
Yasmine Samalya
Defendant:
National Railroad & Passenger Corporation-Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
