Cases 111 - 120 of 22,159
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James C Chenault
Defendant:
S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Turnkey Health
as 4:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant:
Turnkey Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
L Watson, Haywood and Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv06034
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle and Does Lieutenant, E.A.R.U. Max; Mental Health Doctor, Central Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granado v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Joe Granado
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Andrews v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Andrews, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Gayla Telano, Dr. Deana Hopson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosso v. Sears et al
as 5:2024cv05096
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Rosso
Defendant:
Sergeant Sarah Sears, Corporal Joel Minor, Corporal Dakota Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
