Cases 121 - 130 of 1,081
United States of America v. Lagan
as 1:2020cv00856
Defendant:
Thomas K. Lagan
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Myanmar Asian Inc. v. United States of America Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
as 1:2020cv00765
Plaintiff:
Myanmar Asian Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
United States of America v. $38,406,717.42 in United States Currency
as 1:2020cv06173
Defendant:
$38,406,717.42 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $690,944.62
as 1:2020cv02727
Defendant:
$690,944.62
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Any and All Joint Venture Units of Morgan Interest Holders, et al.
as 1:2020cv00334
Defendant:
Any and All Joint Venture Units of Morgan Interest Holders, et al., 140 Westbrook Hills Drive, Syracuse, New York, 2161 Camelot Drive, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Robert Morgan Limited Partnership III, James Martin, Rocmo 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. $621,501.56 in United States currency, formerly contained in PNC Bank Account No. 1225809374 held in the names of "Edward Anderson" and "EA Collection Clearing LLC"
as 1:2020cv05369
Defendant:
$621,501.56 in United States currency, formerly contained in PNC Bank Account No. 1225809374 held in the names of "Edward Anderson" and "EA Collection Clearing LLC"
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. One Cuniform Tablet Known as the "Gilgamesh Dream Tablet"
as 1:2020cv02222
Defendant:
One Cuniform Tablet Known as the "Gilgamesh Dream Tablet"
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $485,821.65 in United States currency formerly on deposit in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Account 209715972, held in the name of "RFTR Corporation," and all funds traceable thereto, et al
as 1:2020cv05179
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$434,122.61 in United States currency formerly on deposit in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Account 519888635, held in the name of "Mooshad Consulting NYC, Inc.," and all funds traceable th and $485,821.65 in United States currency formerly on deposit in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Account 209715972, held in the name of "RFTR Corporation," and all funds traceable thereto,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $12,860.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2020cv05189
Defendant:
$12,860.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $189,019.92 in United States Currency formerly on deposit at Chemical Bank in Account Number 172-062-4282-65, held in the name of SAB MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SALES CORP. et al
as 1:2020cv05101
Defendant:
$48,783.40 in United States Currency, formerly on deposit at Chemical Bank in Account Number 172-063-3648-65, held in the name of LECHIUM MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP, $189,019.92 in United States Currency formerly on deposit at Chemical Bank in Account Number 172-062-4282-65, held in the name of SAB MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SALES CORP., $53,072.52 in United States Currency, formerly on deposit at Smith Barney in Account Number 101-30465-19 held in the name of STEVEN A. BONANNO, Account for Nicole Bonanno and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
$729.79 in United States Currency, formerly on deposit at Chemical Bank in Account Number 294-061-8024-65, held in the name of JOANNE DELPONTE BONANNO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
