Cases 141 - 150 of 5,629
Knight v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Teri Knight
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nodak Insurance Company v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2023cv00201
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Weflen v. Hess Bakken Investments II, LLC
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Dennis Weflen
Defendant:
Hess Bakken Investments II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hoff v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Heather Davis, Anthony Holly and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cass County Jail
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Williams
Defendant:
Cass County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Quaife v. Brady Martz & Associates, P.C.
as 3:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Jason Quaife
Defendant:
Brady Martz & Associates, P.C.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
John Hoffer, Amanda Koffler and Alec R. Kiesow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hoffer v. Brady Martz & Associates, P.C.
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
John Hoffer
Defendant:
Brady Martz & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Koffler v. Brady Martz & Associates, P.C.
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Amanda Koffler
Defendant:
Brady Martz & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hoff v. LeFevre
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Troy LeFevre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook doing business as Meta doing business as Meta, LLC., Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
