Cases 11 - 20 of 22,023
Kirkpatrick v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Loris E Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Reece et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Lt. Deputy Tracey Reece and Sheriff Tyrone Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Google LLC (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Google LLC doing business as Youtube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Marenzo Marquis Roberts
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reaves et al v. City of Auburn et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Bianca Reaves and Kathy R. Williams
Defendant:
City of Auburn, City of Auburn Police Department, Cedric Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams v. Office of General Counsel et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Office of General Counsel, Alabama DHR, Barbour DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glenn v. ATR Auto Transport & Recovery (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Qiana Glenn
Defendant:
ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
