Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 70,705
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights-Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lynn Detillion v. OH Dept of Rehabilitation and Corr, et al
as 24-3347
Plaintiff: LYNN EVELYN DETILLION
Defendant: OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and OHIO CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AFSCME LOCAL 11, AFL-CIO
Tamica Branscumb v. Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
as 24-1357
Plaintiff: TAMICA BRANSCUMB, an individual
Defendant: HORIZON BANK, identified on initiating document as Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
C.S. v. Craig McCrumb, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff: C.S., by her next friend, Adam Stroub
Defendant: CRAIG MCCRUMB, AMY LEFFEL and MICHAEL PAPANEK
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff: JOHN COOK
Defendant: DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Caldwell v. Luster et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff: Karl Jason Caldwell
Defendant: Deputy Ron Luster and Lincoln County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02275
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?