Cases 31 - 40 of 24,848
Henry v. Greenville County Court et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Petitioner:
Kelvin Toyo Henry
Respondent:
Sheriff Greenville County Court, Sheriff Greenville Police Department, Cheif Consel Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Ray et al
as 5:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dwight Xavier Jones, Dwight X Jones and Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Director Patricia Ray, Captain Sweat, Officer Tamiko Greg Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hewins v. USA
as 6:2024cv02095
Petitioner:
Zaire Lamond Devante Hewins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Moumouni v. Chester County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Rose Moumouni and Rose B. Moumouni
Defendant:
Chester County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Alston v. Gallant Et AL
as 0:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Andrew W. Gallant Et AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Spade v. Sharp
as 1:2024cv00866
Petitioner:
Daniel William Spade
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timmons v. Turner
as 4:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Justin Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Orr v. Richland County et al
as 4:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Richland County, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center, C.O. Madison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Reed v. Hampton
as 3:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Lavern Justin Reed
Defendant:
Emily W Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Timmons v. Smith
as 4:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Corporal Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
