Cases 31 - 40 of 165,266
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 24-40337
Petitioner:
Nicholas Nahrue Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Edget v. State of Mississippi
as 24-60221
Plaintiff:
Hudson Lynn Edget
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Allen v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Allen
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail and Sheriff Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Joseph Davis, Gabriel Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyner v. Arnold et al
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Scott Tyner
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Arnold, Warden Unknown Brown, Unit Manager Loretta Crockett and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01099
Petitioner:
Wyatt Busby
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sewell v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Larry Gene Sewell
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Howard County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jim Bob White
Defendant:
Howard County Sheriffs Office, Simon Munoz, John Doe 1:24-cv-00069 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
BOP and SCFO - TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00412
Petitioner:
Hector Moises Andrade Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
