Cases 31 - 40 of 27,634
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burns v. Evergreen Design & Construction, LLC
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Duane Burns
Defendant:
Evergreen Design & Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Roberts v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (JRG2)
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Roberts
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Moore et al v. Knox County et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Rex Allen Moore and Deanna Moore
Defendant:
Knox County, Knox County Schools Administration, Jon Rysewy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Dover's Cylinder Head Service Inc. v. Unifirst Corporation
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dover's Cylinder Head Service Inc.
Defendant:
Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ledford v. Hensley et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Ledford
Defendant:
Mike Hensley, Walmart Unicoi, Aaron Embler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Logan v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Robert Logan
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Unum Group Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Doe #039 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Doe #039
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gray v. McConnell et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Gray
Defendant:
Joyce McConnell, Sandy Metcalf and Vicky Afisov
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
