Cases 41 - 50 of 23,398
Ruark v. Northeast Georgia Physicians Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Ruark
Defendant:
Northeast Georgia Physicians Group, Inc., MedLink Georgia, Inc., M.D. Niraj Parikh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice
Parker v. Myers Park Opco, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Parker, as Administrator of The Estate of Betty Angela Parker
Defendant:
Myers Park Opco, LLC and The Portopiccolo Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kull v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02180
Plaintiff:
CEK
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Kull v. Habakus
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Kull
Defendant:
Dr. Scott Habakus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Martinez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Gary v. Ackley et al
as 6:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Tondre Gary
Defendant:
Dr. John Ackley, PA-C Dylan Redding, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Yaw v. Chang
as 3:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Ah Ba Yaw
Defendant:
Anita Chang and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Baker v. Oregon Health & Science University et al
as 3:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Maureen E. Baker
Defendant:
Oregon Health & Science University, Rodney F. Pommier, Glenn I. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Woodall v. The United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Stacy Woodall
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
