Cases 61 - 70 of 287
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Loflin
as 2:2019cv02548
Defendant:
David M Loflin
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wilcox
as 2:2019cv02437
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Quentin Louis Wilcox
Kistenmacher v. Sanghi et al
as 2:2018cv04720
Defendant:
Wade F Meyercord, Esther L Johnson, Ganesh Moorthy and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kistenmacher
Maknissian v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02924
Defendant:
Ganesh Moorthy, James Eric Bjornholt, Stephen Sanghi and others
Plaintiff:
Shant Maknissian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02914
Defendant:
Steven Sanghi, Microchip Technology Incorporated and Ganesh Moorthy
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Jackson
Avant-Garde LLC v. Mountain Spa Properties, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01499
Defendant:
Richard H Bloomfield, Daniel Byer, Timothy R Forstrom and others
Plaintiff:
Avant-Garde LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Harbour
as 2:2018cv02401
Defendant:
David A Harbour
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bennett v. Kapoor et al
as 2:2018cv02170
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated, Patrick Fourteau, Michael Babich and others
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Soltau v. Kapoor et al
as 2:2018cv01720
Plaintiff:
Jim Soltau
Defendant:
John N Kapoor , Michael Babich, Darryl S Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Harmon et al v. Hays et al
as 2:2017cv04493
Defendant:
Springboard Incorporated, Gavin Hays, Unknown Hays and others
Plaintiff:
Apex Medical Staffing LLC and Thomas Harmon
Counter Defendant:
Amanda Hanson, Stefani Fox and Phoenix Medical Staffing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
