Cases 61 - 70 of 157,783
Palmer v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Layna Palmer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jada Padua v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
JADA M. PADUA
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Hardin v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hardin
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Crone v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2024cv02622
Plaintiff:
Jason Crone
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
YOUNGER, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05716
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. YOUNGER, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodwin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Tammy Goodwin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50163
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Devenney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Wendy Sune Devenney
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILES JR. v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. WILES JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Farmer v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2024cv01253
Plaintiff:
Mary C Farmer
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
