Cases 71 - 80 of 43,393
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Berrios v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
Edwin Eddie Berrios
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carmona
Defendant:
Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bhagtana et al v. Schindler Elevator Corporation
as 3:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Satwant Bhagtana and Kulwant Singh
Defendant:
Schindler Elevator Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cayer v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 3:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Diane Cayer
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valentin v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jose Valentin
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robichaud v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Nicole D Robichaud
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of SSA Decision DIWC - Title II Worker or Child Claims
Hines et al v. Damhas et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Damhas, Earl Given, 915 Lafayette Blv Room 400 06604 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
