Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 70,794
Ledford v. Hensley et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: Randall Eugene Ledford
Defendant: Mike Hensley, Walmart Unicoi, Aaron Embler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lynn Kizer v. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
as 24-5207
Plaintiff: LYNN KIZER
Defendant: ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL
Mastrogiovanni v. Sterling Heights, City of et al
as 5:2024cv10598
Plaintiff: Richard Mastrogiovanni
Defendant: Sterling Heights, City of, Shelby, Township of, N. Pomante and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff: David Bryan Brooks
Defendant: Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02287
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Strege v. Nuclear Missile Rosatom et al
as 2:2024cv11156
Plaintiff: Adam Strege
Defendant: Nuclear Missile Rosatom, Social Security, 10 Unknown Named Grand Rapids Michigan Social Security Admirative Law Judges Office Worker and others
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #039 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: John Doe #039
Defendant: William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10600
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?