Cases 71 - 80 of 140,615
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woods v. Beazley Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Woods
Defendant:
Beazley Insurance Company, Truckers Service Association, TrueNorth Companies, L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
De La Rosa-Tejeda v. Flemming
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel De La Rosa-Tejeda
Defendant:
CO Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady et al v. Wood County, West Virginia
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Grady and Kenneth S. Grady
Defendant:
Wood County, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00213
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Wilkinson v. ADT, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Billy Wilkinson, III
Defendant:
ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dee Dee Dallas Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Curtis Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Louie Thompson Price and John Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mellott v. DiCiolla et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Howard Mellott, II
Defendant:
Magistrate Ronald J. DiCiolla and State's Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lanier v. Barlow et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lanier
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Barlow, Corporal B. A. Shinaberry, Deputy Kendal Ober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
