Cases 81 - 90 of 28,450
White v. Liggins
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth White
Defendant:
De'Angelo Liggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dunn v. Miller
as 3:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Virginia T Dunn
Defendant:
Bradley B Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. The State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
SirGregory P. Jackson
Defendant:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sepulvado v. Lodrigue
as 5:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Steven Dean Sepulvado, Jr
Defendant:
Ronald Lodrigue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Schochenmaier v. Gomez et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schochenmaier
Defendant:
John Gomez, Jorge Esparza, Juan Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Money v. City of San Marcos
as 24-50187
Plaintiff:
Kristy Kay Money and Rolf Jacob Sraubhaar
Defendant:
City of San Marcos and Amanda Hernandez, in her official capacity as Director of Planning and Development Services
Thaggard v. Treeline Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thaggard
Defendant:
Treeline Services, LLC, Anthony Jones, Michael Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Garcia v. Authier
as 4:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Juan Daniel Garcia
Defendant:
Russ Authier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samtani v. City of Laredo
as 24-40327
Plaintiff:
Manoj R. Samtani, also known as Luvi Samtani, AS Number 1, a Minor Female Child and Anisha Samtani
Defendant:
City of Laredo, Laredo Police Department, Juan Jose Lazcano, III, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
