Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Hagg v. Tubbesing
as 4:2021cv00040
Respondent:
Tara Tubbesing
Petitioner:
Brian G. Hogg and Brian G. Hagg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. State of Missouri Department of Mental Health
as 4:2020cv01646
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Jones
Defendant:
State of Missouri Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Southeast Mental Health Center et al
as 4:2017cv02076
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant:
Southeast Mental Health Center, Denise Boyde and Fulton State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Fulton State Hospital et al
as 4:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Stephen David Hawke, Fulton State Hospital and Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center et al
as 4:2017cv02078
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant:
Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center, Denise Boyde, Dewane Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windeknecht v. Missouri Dept. of Mental Health et al
as 4:2020cv00293
Defendant:
Missouri Dept. of Mental Health, Kathy Hammond and Bill Anderson
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wright v. Missouri Department of Mental Health
as 4:2018cv01981
Plaintiff:
Pete Wright
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Crump v. Maragh
as 4:2018cv00922
Plaintiff:
Carlneus Crump
Defendant:
Tamar Maragh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweate v. Jackson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
Davonta Sweate
Defendant:
Jackson County, Missouri , Joseph Piccinini , Patricia Woolfolk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Masek v. Chastiain et al
as 4:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Masek
Defendant:
Antonina Chastiain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
