Cases 101 - 110 of 46,239
Spates v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Saterika Spates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Provencio v. Cestui Que Trust Co
as 4:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Provencio
Defendant:
Cestui Que Trust Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isham v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Isham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Randall v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Randy Randall
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins, Greg Henry and Will Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooney v. Knuckles
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Tyrone Cooney
Defendant:
Brady Knuckles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKee et al v. Heard et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Barbara McKee and William McKee
Defendant:
Marquet D Heard, Direct Chassislink Inc and Lionhart Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Barajas v. Saline County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Barajas
Defendant:
Saline County, Arkansas, Hunter Thompson, Sullivan Sulzberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toston v Parson, et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Charles Toston
Defendant:
Rick Parson and Sharon Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Pulaski County, Arkansas
as 4:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Britney Clark
Defendant:
Pulaski County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Titus v. Akoo Brand et al
as 4:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Michael Iamsui Titus
Defendant:
Akoo Brand, Vladamir Putin, Tesla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
