Cases 1 - 10 of 30,548
Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. d/b/a Office Star et al v. Millerknoll, Inc.
as 5:2014cv01926
Plaintiff:
Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. doing business as Office Star and Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Defendant:
Herman Miller, Inc. and Millerknoll, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
FRIS OFFICE OUTFITTERS, INC., iFURN.com, INC. D/B/A OFFICESTAR-FURNITURE-DIRECT.COM, GAMESIS, INC. D/B/A OFFICESTARSTORE.COM and D/B/A TSCSHOPS.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
R. Fellen, Inc. et al v. RehabCare Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02081
Plaintiff:
R. Fellen, Inc. a California corporation Doing business as Sunnyside Convalescent Hospital and Dakota Medical, Inc. a California corporation Doing business as Glenoaks Convalescent Hospital
Defendant:
RehabCare Group, Inc. and Cannon & Associates, LLC a Delaware limited liability corporation Doing business as Polaris Group
Petitioner:
Scott Zimmermann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC et al v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03053
Counter Defendant:
Kambiz Benjamin Omidi, Cindy Omidi, Asiatrust Nevis and others
Plaintiff:
Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC, Bakersfield Surgery Institute, LLC, Independent Medical Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Imperium Medical Services, Inc.
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group, Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc., UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Senne et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al
as 3:2014cv00608
Plaintiff:
Lee Smith, Nick Giarraputo, Matt Frevert and others
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Baseball P'ship, Cleveland Indians Basebell Co., L.P., Baltimore Orioles, L.P. and others
Intervenor:
Cody Sedlock, Edwin Mateo, Luis Yarnel Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dana Gold et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 3:2014cv05373
Plaintiff:
Dana Gold, Tammy Emery, Russell Dornon and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Benjamin Faber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Satoshi Okubo
Respondent:
Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party:
Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Yujin Robot Inc. v. Synet Electronics Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06237
Defendant:
Synet Electronics Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Benjamin S. Seigel
3Rd Party Defendant:
Yujin Robot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yujin Robot Inc. and Yujin Robot Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macias et al v. Lange
as 3:2014cv02763
Defendant:
Myron Lange
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rich and Erika Macias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
L.A. Printex Industries Inc v. Maurices Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv05472
Defendant:
Leebe Apparel, Inc., Maurices Incorporated and Does 1-10 inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Thomas Chan
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
