Cases 41 - 50 of 111,958
PEUGH et al v. NADLER et al
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTA PEUGH and BCC CONCESSIONS, LLC
Defendant:
ADAM J. NADLER and TWISTED TATERS FOOD TRUCK AND MORE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Lopez et al v. Dakich et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ph.D. Dr. Linda Lopez and Impact Strategies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dakich, Ryan D. Lafler, Greater South Shore Technology Initiative, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Campos v. Walmart Inc
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Maria Campos
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
DEVINE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DEVINE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAIRSTON v. STATE OF INDIANA/INDPLS. et al
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
STARR HAIRSTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA/INDPLS., FISHERS COMMUNITY NORTH HOSPITAL, IPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
