First Circuit Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 156,236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wright-Cray v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Wcm Wright-Cray
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Other:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Standing Trees, Inc. v. US Forest Service et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Standing Trees, Inc.
Defendant:
US Forest Service, White Mountain National Forest, Forest Supervisor, Pemigewasset Ranger District, District Ranger and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Diamond Sports, LLC d/b/a Rimas Sports v. Major League Baseball Players Association
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Diamond Sports, LLC d/b/a Rimas Sports
Defendant:
Major League Baseball Players Association
Latham v. Officer Oneill et al
as 1:2024cv11318
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Officer Oneill and Legal Mail Officer at Old Colony Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maroney, et al v. Fiorentini, et al
as 24-1461
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MARONEY, as Trustee of Premiere Realty Trust and MARONEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES J. FIORENTINI, individually and in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Haverhill, HAVERHILL, MA and ROBERT E. WARD, individually and in his capacity as Deputy Director of Public Works of the City of Haverhill Water/Wastewater Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
