Cases 31 - 40 of 16,181
United States of America v. $140,690.00 United States Currency et al
as 8:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$140,690.00 United States Currency and 2019 Honda Civic
Claimant:
Jacob Anthony Pennewell-Battaglia
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Watson v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
Marsavion Watson
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Busboom v. Morton Buildings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Garry Busboom
Defendant:
Morton Buildings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
as 8:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Alexis E. Peterson
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Khalaf v. Immigration (ICE)
as 4:2024cv03053
Petitioner:
Sattar Sabri Khalaf
Respondent:
Immigration (ICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barber v. Lampman et al
as 8:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
RaySean Barber
Defendant:
Ben Lampman and Other Unkown Individuals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Starr v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 8:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Edgar Starr
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union, Mary McDuffe and John Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
