Federal cases, dockets and filings from U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal

Cases filed

Cases 31 - 40
US v. Jerry Osbey
as 15-6779
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JERRY OSBEY, a/k/a Little O
US v. Michael Williams
as 15-6780
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL CRANDALE WILLIAMS
Metaphyzic Supreme-El v. Director, Department of Correc
as 15-6781
Petitioner - Appellant: METAPHYZIC EL-ECTROMAGNETI SUPREME-EL, f/k/a Antonio Edward McLean
Respondent - Appellee: DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
US v. Rances Amaya
as 15-6783
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RANCES ULICES AMAYA, a/k/a Murder, a/k/a Blue
US v. James Frazier, Jr.
as 15-6784
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES EDWARD FRAZIER, JR.
Alberto Lopez v. Joseph McFadden
as 15-6785
Petitioner - Appellant: ALBERTO ROMERO LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN
US v. Robert Milligan
as 15-6786
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ROBERT DEWAYNE MILLIGAN, a/k/a Wayne
Anthony Peace v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10456
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY PEACE
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Curtis Sheppard, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10457
Petitioner - Appellant: CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Senrick Wilkerson v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10458
Petitioner - Appellant: SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.