Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 202
US v. Richard Tipton
as 22-5
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD TIPTON, a/k/a Whittey
Steven Bixby v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-4
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN VERNON BIXBY
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and LYDELL CHESTNUT, Deputy Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Stephen Stanko v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-3
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN C. STANKO
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution and LYDELL CHESTNUT, Deputy Warden of Broad River Correctional Secure Facility
Stephen Stanko v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-2
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN C. STANKO
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections and MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Sigmon et al v. Stirling et al
as 3:2021cv01651
Plaintiff:
Brad Keith Sigmon and Freddie E Owens
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Bryan P. Stirling
Intervenor Defendant:
Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sigmon v. Stirling et al
as 3:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Brad Sigmon
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, South Carolina Department of Corrections and Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GROOMS v. THOMAS
as 1:2019cv00396
Petitioner:
Timmy Euvonne Grooms
Respondent:
EDWARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sexton v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv01007
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jerry Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2018hc02297
Petitioner:
Melvin L. White, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Davis
as 0:2018cv01544
Petitioner:
Quincy J. Allen
Respondent:
Willie D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
