Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,017
Lizcano v. Lumpkin
as 23-70006
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Lizcano
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Murphy v. Nasser
as 23-70005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jedidiah Isaac Murphy
Defendant / Appellant:
Ali Mustapha Nasser
Cramer v. USA
as 1:2023cv00355
Petitioner:
Christopher Emory Cramer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 23-70004
Petitioner / Appellant:
Micah Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 23-70003
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Medina
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thomas v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv01005
Petitioner:
Steven Alan Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
George Thomas Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Vasquez v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Richard Vasquez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 23-70002
Petitioner:
Dexter Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sorto v. Lumpkin
as 22-70013
Petitioner / Appellant:
Walter Alexander Sorto
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
