Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,017
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 22-70005
Petitioner / Appellant:
Matthew Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Buntion v. Collier
as 22-70004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Wayne Buntion
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Dennis Crowley
Buntion v. Lumpkin
as 22-70003
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carl Wayne Buntion
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Milton Gobert v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Crimi
as 22-70002
Petitioner / Appellant:
Milton Dwayne Gobert
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Buntion v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01104
Petitioner:
Carl Wayne Buntion
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Tabler v. Lumpkin
as 22-70001
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Lee Tabler
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Escobar v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Areli Escobar
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv01384
Petitioner:
Amos Wells
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calvert v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00436
Petitioner:
James Calvert
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ex
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv02333
Petitioner:
Franklin Davis
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
