Sixth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 873
Doe #4 v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00595
Plaintiff:
John Doe #4
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Does #1 - #8 v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Consolidated Plaintiff:
John Doe #3, John Doe #2, John Doe #5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe #3 v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00594
Plaintiff:
John Doe #3
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe #5 v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00596
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe #2 v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00593
Plaintiff:
John Doe #2
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe #7 v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00598
Plaintiff:
John Doe #7
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curb Records, Inc. et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00500
Plaintiff:
Curb Records, Inc. and Mike Curb Foundation
Defendant:
William Lee, William B. Herbert, IV, Carter Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Of Ohio v. Murrell
as 1:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
State Of Ohio
Defendant:
Durand E Murrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SERIES 17-00003-615, a designated series of MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company v. Par Pharmaceutical et al
as 1:2021op45079
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical, Holiday CVS, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
SERIES 17-03-615, a designated series of MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company
Blocker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00447
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Agency, Joe Biden, Michigan, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
